How Skeptical Is Quine’s “Modal Skepticism”?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Skeptical Theism and Moral Skepticism
Skeptical theists purport to undermine evidential arguments from evil by appealing to the fact that our knowledge of goods, evils, and their interconnections is signi cantly limited. Michael J. Almeida and Graham Oppy have recently argued that skeptical theism is unacceptable because it results in a form of moral skepticism which rejects inferences that play an important role in our ordinary mo...
متن کاملOccam’s Razor, Dogmatism, Skepticism, and Skeptical Dogmatism
Underdetermination arguments for skepticism maintain that our common sense view of the external world is no better, evidentially speaking, than some skeptical competitors. An important and well-known response by dogmatists, those who believe our commonsense view is justified, appeals to abduction or inference to the best explanation. The predominant version of this strategy, going back at least...
متن کاملWhat Is a Skeptical Proof?
We investigate the task of skeptically reasoning in extensionbased, nonmonotonic logics by concentrating on general argumentation theories. The restricted applicability of Dung’s notion of skeptical provability in his well-known argumentation framework is illustrated, and a new approach based on the notion of a claim associated with each argument is proposed. We provide a formal definition of a...
متن کاملArtificial cells as reified quines
Cellular automata were initially conceived as a formal model to study self-replicating systems. Although reproduction by biological cells is characterized by exponential population increase, no population of self-replicating machines modeled as a cellular automaton has ever exhibited such rapid growth. We believe this is due to the inability of cellular automata to model bonded complexes of rei...
متن کاملSkepticism, Sensitivity, and Closure, or Why the Closure Principle is Irrelevant to External World Skepticism
Is there a plausible argument for external world skepticism? Robert Nozick’s well–known discussion focuses upon arguments which utilize the Sensitivity Requirement and the Closure Principle. Nozick claims, correctly, that no such argument succeeds. But he gets almost all the details wrong. The Sensitivity Requirement and the Closure Principle are compatible; the Sensitivity Requirement is incor...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The Monist
سال: 2017
ISSN: 0026-9662,2153-3601
DOI: 10.1093/monist/onx004